The men’s changing room theory of social media
I’ve been thinking a bit about social media lately, and it strikes me that the whole thing is exactly like a men’s changing room (swimming pool or gym rather than clothes shop).
Now, I must admit that it’s been about fifteen or twenty years since I was last in one but I have a feeling they haven’t really changed much. They all smell of bollock and are inhabited by one of three types:
1: Mr Sheepish. This bloke is very shy and reserved. He wants no one to see his lower portion so he might well shower with his trunks on and put his pants on under a towel. In social media terms he either doesn’t get involved at all or he joined Facebook a couple of years ago but never updates his status. He doesn’t see why anyone would want to share what they’re doing with all and sundry. Can’t some things just remain private? However, although he doesn’t want anyone to see his business, he does like a sneaky peak at the photos of his teenage daughter’s friends on their diving holiday, just to see that they were behaving themselves (and to inspire an unfathomably guilty wank).
2. Mr Average neither tries to hide nor makes an exhibition of himself. Getting changed is a largely functional process that gets him from the outside world to the pool and back again. For him, social media is good to keep in touch, share a few pics and maybe organise a party, but he’s not much of a Twitterer (just follows Stephen Fry, Lady Gaga and his boss) and he’d never go as far as Four Square because he doesn’t actually want everyone knowing that he’s down the pub when he should be working on a spread sheet about yellow fat marketing.
3. Mr ‘Coo-ee! Get a load of my cock!’. This is the chap who behaves exactly as he does in the office, but with his genitalia on full display. Whether chatting to friends or demonstrating karate kicks, he’ll do so apparently unaware that his meat and two veg and flying hither and yon in a most unseemly fashion. In social media terms this is the guy who signed up to Twitter when the rest of us thought it was as sad as voluntarily watching Love Actually. He went through Bebo and MySpace, perhaps even creating a wang-out avatar for Second Life, and now ‘Likes’ everything from Vin Diesel to Cif, joins ten Facebook groups a week and updates Foursquare when he goes from the bathroom to the kitchen.
I’ve never been in a woman’s changing room, but I’ve seen a few (Carrie, Porky’s, Bring It On etc.) and imagine they are pretty similar places, just with more tits and fannies and fewer penii.
Hey ben, have you played football with the creative gods at russell square?
The shower room experience was one of the most surreal I’ve encountered…
Nope, but Watford 95-96 was a pretty odd shower experience. You should have seen how we celebrated Christmas.
This seems a wordy way of saying social media users are cautious, adventurous or average – just like every other activity. The point being?
Are tea drinkers cautious, average or adventurous?
The point, as with all my posts, is to help you waste a little of your day.
Job done, I believe.
That should really be “penes” assuming it is treated as a Latin third declension noun.Just thought I’d mention it.
I’m not really fussed about Facebook but I love getting my cock out, especially at Christmas parties where I leave it hanging out of my strides until someone notices. Usually a hot girl, who then, like in Handjob Boogaloo 4, really wants me. I’m confused now.
By the way, if you tuck your cock and balls between your legs, it makes it look like you have a fanny. Who knew?
Pedant has brightened my day.
Are you talking nominative plural or ablative plural?
Which category would you say that you fall into Ben?
Balls out? Or facing the wall when you put your pants on?
And to what extent do you think behaviour depends on what you do?
How involved in social media are those mothers in Delaware?
Nominative plural, of course.
But I’ve got a ‘with’ in there. Why is that not ablative?
And Northern Suit: I must be somewhere between average and exhibitionist. Lots of blogging, Twitter and a bit of Facebook but no Foursquare, MySpace, Bebo, Second Life etc.
Come, come Ben you’re just being arch now. Besides, if we treated it as ablative the word would be “penibus” which,frankly,would be preposterous
Ben vs Pedant. Waiting for the Life Of Brian pay-off when Ben has to paint “Penes” or “Penii” (or whatever) 200 times on the blog……
[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Charlie Spencer, Ben Kay. Ben Kay said: New post: the men's changing room theory of social media http://ow.ly/3FzYj […]
Another nagging question that needs answering: How come it says 14 comments
on this post, but when you go to the actual comments there are only 13. You
have a smart following, someone must know the answer.
Ciaran
For some reason they count the Trackbacks.
What the fuck is a Trackback?
And what the fuck is a Pingback?
Thank you.
I’m not sure about Trackback but I think I witnessed two of my teammates do a Pingback in the chganing room after a rugby game years ago.
Ciaran
Trackback. Pingback. It’s all Brokeback.
funny and quite accurate at certain points in time i guess. now if thats put in some strange diagram with a user and time scale and youll get some sort of bell curve, like a product lifecycle or something. also all that diffusion of innovation theory, early adopters and stuff…
oh well, sorry, its the neurons firing.