Digital convenience vs analogue romance
When I got my first iPod, I downloaded all my CDs onto my computer and sold the discs on Amazon.
Last week I got rid of all my DVD boxes and put the discs into two enormous zip up thingies. If I could download them all onto a hard drive as easily as I added the CDs, I would, and would then get rid of the annoying disc containers.
Now all I’m left with is books, but as far as I’m concerned, books are different. They serve two purposes: you can read them, and they look great on a shelf (they also show people how darned clever you are because they can see RIGHT BEFORE THEIR EYES that you have read War and Peace, or Not A Penny More, Not A Penny Less). So there’s no way I’d get rid of them, right?
Well, maybe.
I don’t think I’d ever throw them away (I can’t download them onto a digital device), but I have to say that its much less likely that I’ll be adding to them. You see, I now have an iPad, and find reading from it to be much easier and more enjoyable than trying to hold a book up and turn its pages, particularly if I’m doing something else (stroking my new kitten, eating an artichoke, picking my nose etc.). It’s also wonderfully simple and easy to buy a book instantly, and they’re often cheaper than the analogue variety.
I also accepted the fact that I rarely read a book twice. For example, No Logo has been sitting on my shelf since I read it a decade ago. Its assertions and information were starkly relevant in 2001, but are now virtually meaningless, existing in a world that they themselves changed beyond recognition. There is little point in reading No Logo now, but it was a sort of zeitgeisty classic of its time, and there’s something about having it around that feels right (perhaps I am clinging to the sad semblance of credibility that owning a copy in 2001 gave me).
So with that in mind I can’t see myself buying many physical books in future. I’ve just downloaded One Day by David Nicholls, a book I would definitely have bought in analogue form in the past. I suppose I’ll then read it and store it in my iBooks in case my wife or kids want to check it out, then forget about it, relegating its existence to a postage stamp-sized representation of its cover that I will never open again.
I suppose some of you are now reading this swearing that you will never let anything so vulgar and unromantic happen to you, and perhaps you’re right, but this is the direction in which the world is heading. Electronic books make sense in lots of ways (I haven’t even mentioned how much an arse it is to carry a hardback around), so storing millions of pages on one small device could well be the future for most of us. Is that a shame? Maybe, but what you lose in fusty bits of paper, you make up for in convenience, value and practicality, not to mention the benefits to the environment.
Having said all that, though, I must admit to harbouring an analogue fantasy: when my kids are old enough not mess it up, I really want to get a record player and start a collection of my favourite albums: totally impractical, pointlessly expensive and utterly unnecessary.
I can’t wait.
I saw a report recently that found that the number of books in the house was as important as parent’s education level (controlled for a host of factors) in determining the educational achievements of offspring. (I like to call my children offspring, stops them getting too cosy).
Not type of books or anything, just having them in the house. I’m not sure a well stocked Kindle would have the same effect, but there again, it might.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/05/100520213116.htm
I disagree about DVDs. I love having a library of them to choose from. When all your discs are put away you’ll never watch them…
Interesting thing about the record player. I have found that I listen to music on Spotify when I’m at work or out, and vinyl when I’m home. I don’t want that instant quality, getting up to change over a record means I’m usually forced to sit through a side and listen to it. Anyway kids love vinyl, it’s great teaching them to ‘put a record on’, they get to see music ‘working’.
But books I’ll keep. You can read them in the bath. Not that I’m against the Kindle – it’s great, especially if you’re an academic. Of course, the academic community is dragging its heels adopting it.
I stare at my endless stack of books thinking of a day when I can have my own lounge (that isn’t shared) where I can start my own library of things I like. You know, like in the films!
Now it’s rather like a hoard of books gathering dust, that I’ve read once. I’ve not jumped to reading on the likes of iPads or Kindle’s yet. I tried it on my iPhone once, but just didn’t get the satisfaction of finishing a book of loosely held together pages, dog-eared and beaten.
For all the love of yellowing pages, tell me I can still have my bookshelf… 🙁
I hate clutter, but books I can’t avoid. You can’t put your feet up and pluck a random from a shelf on an iReader of sorts.
Imagine what a library will be like in 20 years from now… shit.
Books do look good on your shelf if you’re a reader but if you’re me they have the opposite effect. They make me look like the only things I’m interested in are the Russian front, drug smuggling and 70’s Hollywood. I need a Kindle asap because frankly it’s fucking embarrassing.
I read the same study. I’d guess, though, that the books are indicative of other positive factors.
By the way, Monopoly, Cluedo and all that are waaaaaaaaaaaayyyyy better on an iPad.
After decorating I had to put all our books back on the shelves. A prime opportunity for a sort out, all were kept. We re read the ones we enjoy but keep all of them. As well as that we feel that it’s a great environment for our children as they can see that not everything is on the lap top they are also encouraged to read and go to the library for enjoyment. In this modern world there are plenty of reasons to have everything in the Ipad but there is also plenty of room for books and records too. I’ve just started getting my vinyl out out of storage and it sounds great.
Printed books are things you can pass on to friends, travelers, strangers, whoever. And there’s nothing better than sharing a good book.
I love my Kindle, but I still buy books and give them to charity when I’ve finished (no more shelves) unless they’re for reference. Presumably not everybody has/wants a Kindle and will still want books.
I miss page numbers (somehow, percentage read doesn’t feel right), but nothing else. The Kindle is brilliant, and I speak as someone who has never loved with iTunes.
Louisa, I can’t see why you couldn’t pass on an ebook, if your recipient also has an ebook reader.
It should be no different to sharing an audio book.
Mind you, Kindle/Amazon block it currently through a complicated registration system. And I would be surprised if Apple don’t do that too.
But it seems feasible that the big boys might allow time-based ebook sharing: “You can share it for a week or two. And if you don’t finish it, well, just go buy it”.
Then again, a £5 book I can lend to anyone, versus a 90p book I can’t, and I can see why the big boys would stop us sharing.
handbrake.fr will help you get rid of your DVD folder.
‘the prophet of high-tech said digital preservation was doomed to fail. “There are forms of media which are just inherently unstable,” he said, “and the attempt to stabilize them is like the attempt to go out and stabilize the corkboard at the laundromat.”‘
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/07/opinion/sunday/when-data-disappears.html
i prefer a book in my hands. it is less elusive that way.
there is a different haptic experience to each book. and i like the different smell. all part of the analogue reading experience and surely influencing how i like a book.
i go so far to print out ebooks i want to read in full.
I was very excited about reading on the ipad. I would be telling everyone about how good it was. Everything about it seemed prefect.
And then something happened.
The novelty wore off.
And now it’s back to books for me. It took me about 5 months to go back.
Ben, I have a bunch of vinyl from the 60s through the 80s I’d love to get rid of. From the Beatles to Alan Parsons Project, The Fixx, Steely Dan, etc. Interested?
Rob: I’m thinking in at least five years time. Then again, maybe an acquisition like this would be just the boost I need.
Hmmm…
What kind of price are we talking?
And it seems that maybe life requires digital convenience and analogue warmth, depending on your mood/situation.
Digital or analogue. It’ll still be the same old shit.
I’m clinging onto my vhs tapes and recorder!
If everyone buys digi books, then after a while there will be no more books left in charity shops and all the wrinklies of this country won’t be able to buy them on the cheap to sling on the fire come winter.
HAPTIC???? Fuck – why is Will Self posting as ‘mary’?
it seems i was a fool to think my nom de plume would be subliminally superior to any attempts on investigation. dammit!
Nobody ever got mugged for a copy of the Girl with a Dragon Tattoo. iPads are mugger magnets.
(And chick magnets, but only if you’re playing Angry Bird on it.)
I love books. The physical things as well as actually reading them. (But then I’m sufficiently attached to the physical universe to download MP3s and then burn them onto CDs so I have something to put on the shelf.) Having said that, instead of my usual haul of a dozen paperbacks for this year’s summer holiday, weighing down the suitcase, I just took the Kindle. It was brilliant. And if I fancied something else to read that I hadn’t brought with me, I could just download it, while sitting by the pool. I won’t give up on physical books but the Kindle is a brilliant way of making them portable. It now goes everywhere with me.
iPad doesn’t really work (for me) for text books but is absolutely brilliant for comics. Comics on the iPad are better than in physical form.
One would ‘copy’ their CDs onto a computer. You ‘download’ from an external, non-physical file source. Idiot.
Is digital a bit like opting for a cesarean as opposed to going through all that analogical pushing and shoving?
Yes, God, it’s so stupid not knowing the difference between copying and downloading onto a CD (sarcastic-looking face made out of punctuation).
And yes, John. I believe that is the case.