Odd choice of endorsement
Here’s that ad-whore Audrey Hepburn selling out for Galaxy.
I’m surprised she agreed to do it, really. After all, she was always incredibly thin thanks to an eating disorder developed during the German occupation of her home country of Holland. In the Dutch Famine that followed in the winter of 1944, the Germans blocked the resupply routes of the Netherlands’ already-limited food and fuel supplies as retaliation for railway strikes that were held to hinder German occupation. People starved and froze to death in the streets; Hepburn and many others resorted to making flour out of tulip bulbs to bake cakes and biscuits
When the country was liberated, Hepburn said in an interview that she fell ill from putting too much sugar in her oatmeal and eating an entire can of condensed milk. Hepburn’s wartime experiences then sparked her devotion to UNICEF.
So she wasn’t really that into eating shitty chocolate on a bus, not that Mars or whoever is behind that ad gives a fuck.
I am so outraged by this that I’m not going to go near a Galaxy until at least Thursday.
Y’know, I actually quite like that. Beautifully shot.
Also isn’t there also some famous quote from her saying she loves creamy chocolate or something?(seriously)
Fuck. There is. I take it all back.
http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/118064-let-s-face-it-a-nice-creamy-chocolate-cake-does-a
That ad makes me feel quite ill. Like an Audrey corpse running around.
Her digitized face looks creepy, me thinks. Plus, the rhythm for the ad is somewhat off…
I admit I found this ad quite nauseating. It’s obviously cleverly done, but something is very not right about it. I realise that does not pass for informed advertising critique.
@Sell. Sell. Quite possibly because we all know she’s dead. So it is inherently creepy. Why wouldn’t that spot work with any attractive young lady (or actress) who just happened to be alive? It gives the public just one more reason not to trust what they see in advertising.
Wasn’t she a beautiful young lady?