Remakes
An interesting movie trend reached a peak last year: the remake in disguise.
Star Wars: The Force Awakens essentially remade Star Wars: A New Hope.
Creed was a remake of Rocky.
Mad Max was a second go at Mad Max 1.
Jurassic World was a pretty faithful remake of Jurassic Park.
And of course, Spectre was a remake of every Bond film ever made.
And these were five of the biggest films of the year, so apparently no one noticed, or if they did, they didn’t mind. In fact, most were also well reviewed, so even film critics, who you might expect to be disappointed in the lack of originality on display, didn’t have a problem with it.
But despite all those quotes about ‘talent borrows, genius steals’, the point of using the work of others to inform your own is that something new gets created, not something that is basically the source material under another name. Otherwise what’s to admire? Where is the process of creation? If the greatest twist in movies is that Darth Vader was Luke Skywalker’s father then using a virtually identical twist 34 years later is surely just lazy.
When I was at advertising college the biggest sin was to produce something that had already been done, even if you were unaware that it had already been done. This continued in my working career when people (myself very much included) would point out even tenuous similarities to other, often obscure, campaigns. And there was plenty of sense in that: the benefits of originality (your work standing out more; its freshness being more stimulating and memorable) are obvious.
But if people don’t care that much for originality, and even enjoy the kind of familiar tropes a remake provides, should we always seek to provide it in advertising? And what would happen if we remade great ads?
Pros:
Saves time and money.
Perpetuates ‘quality’ advertising.
No need to research.
Cons:
The original companies and agencies that made the ad may not exist, so you’d have a tough job with rights etc.
The original messages may no longer be relevant.
Doesn’t seem impossible.
What if Levi’s remade Creek or Drugstore? Could Guinness replicate Surfer? What about another go for Cog?
Well, just in case you think there’s merit in the idea, the real question is: can the quality of the original be maintained? Unfortunately, that’s almost impossible to answer for sure, but we do have at least one example where a brilliant original…
was remade with poor results:
So perhaps the reduction in quality of ad agency personnel over the last ten years has left us with people unable to replicate the brilliant originality of others, let alone come up with their own.
Or perhaps remakes, Hollywood or otherwise, are a bit depressing.
This is just a note about the Playstation ads but does it seem like the ad industry has lost its faith in subtlety? And, if so, is that a reflection of the creative, agencies, clients or a mix of all three?
Possibly. Lack of subtlety must be a consequence of greater fear.
With regards to the loss of subtlety, I think it highlights a general shift in culture and consumerism (in the UK and US, at least).
With a market-place that has become increasingly competitive and price-led, and where consumers (who have greater power) get insane levels of instant-gratification from platforms such as SnapChat, Twitter, Instagram, etc., people won’t stand around trying to understand one well-crafted ad when the one straight after it tells them they can get the same product 50-quid cheaper.
Would you argue Volvo’s epic split was a waste because it took the full sixty seconds of the ad to get the point? Or that all of the ads above fail because there’s not a price point at the end?
There’s always going to be someone with the lowest price or the most pandering ad. Always has been. But we, and our clients, have the choice of whether a brand is defined by that or by something larger.
I’m not claiming that ads shouldn’t be clear and communicate something. That’s the job. But to reduce consumers to people who just want to see the lowest price is insulting to them and what we do.
If we throw subtlety out the window then we’re throwing out a huge range of options to differentiate our clients. That makes it a shouting match and a race to see who can spend the most to get into people’s heads. And that’s almost certain to produce loads more sup-par work.
Interesting.
Guinness did revisit Surfer, but I guess it was a spoof rather than an actual remake:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbCNwvALtcM
There are few straight remakes of individual executions but classic campaign elements are sometimes revived, in the same way that the likes of Spiderman and Superman get remade every few years. Unfortunately advertising “franchise reboots” tend to be more Batman Forever than Aliens.
Here are some that occur to me…
Son of Diet Coke Man:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwYCvTpYMCA
The Return of the Tetley Tea Folk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBgDRpwnNu8
The Honey Monster Strikes Back:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udXhS1DeWaE
And didn’t they recently bring back Milk Tray man?
Great examples. Funny that they don’t feel quite the same as the movie ‘revivals’ (probably because they’re ads).
The second Playstation ad doesn’t work because they’re dumbing down. No edge. No reveal. Nothing to keep me watching. Sticky client fingers all over it.
Very good post, Ben.
But is Creed really a remake of Rocky? Isn’t it just following the traditional three act structure set in the world of boxing?
(I thought Creed was terrible by the way).
Yeah, I wasn’t really a fan either. I thought there was a good indie movie in there that had been slathered with ‘traditional three act structure’ pap.
I think it remakes Rocky because yes, it follows the three act boxing movie structure, but it takes a young nobody who builds himself up from nothing with basic training methods and loses his fight but kind of wins anyway. The comparisons are pretty tight considering where else they could have gone.
We had to remake an old P&G ad from the 80s last year.
I think we managed to make it a little less shit than the original.
The classic Ferrero Rocher “Excellente Ambassador” ad was remade using way more money and exactly the same script. It was crap.
When I was growing up in the ad business there were two agencies I always admired: Riney and Chiat.
Riney’s stuff was always good but not always original. Chiat’s stuff was always original but not always good.
It’s probably a chronic issue in the creative arts: Is it better to be original or good?
Original AND good.
But that’s the tough ask.
That’s what made Webster the best
Wasn’t Guinness Surfer already a bit of a remake…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CB6gUdOoVic
I like the name rebootquel as discussed here: http://birthmoviesdeath.com/2015/12/31/the-year-in-rebootquels , different and worth distinguishing from a remake.
I think honest reboots (like many of Neil’s examples) are different from remakes in disguise (like Star Wars).
I really think this is a great post. Thanks
No, thank *you*