Accidental obsolescence
I texted a friend the other day to tell her I’d be arriving at her house by Über. She replied that she was looking forward to seeing me but didn’t agree with Über. She doesn’t like the way it’s doing proper London cabbies out of a job, people who have done three years of The Knowledge and based their entire income streams on the status quo that existed when they decided to drive a taxi.
It’s an interesting argument, but one that has been steamrollered many times by the march of ‘progress’ (define that word as you wish). Automated factories, nuclear power over coal, call centres in India, the cruel way in which those blokes who used to have to walk in front of cars with a red flag to stop them going too fast have been deemed surplus to requirements… The world moves on and, alas, some people get left behind.
But I could also counter the cabbie argument by saying that the only times I’ve been deliberately taken the long way round, it’s been in a black cab (it’s essentially impossible to do that in a credible way if you don’t know the city like the back of your hand). In addition, when I needed a cab at Heathrow last week and I only had a tenner on me, no black cab in quite a long line would accept a credit card. Then, after running around the terminal looking for cash point there was barely enough space to get the four of us plus luggage into the taxi. That strikes me (I don’t know why this realisation has taken me so long) as insane: London’s taxi fleet is less equipped to carry a family plus luggage than a Toyota Prius? WTF? Next, the fare was £7 before we’d even moved. £7. Seven fucking pounds. That’s over $10 to move an inch, part of which was a little extra fee for… drum roll please… taking the fucking luggage unsecured and squashed up around our knees. We took an Über in the opposite direction the following morning; the fare was £7 instead of £14 in the black cab.
So you can build in your own obsolescence by overcharging for a very poor service (let’s not get into the occasional racist chats I’ve had to endure). These cabbies don’t know they’re doing it, but they are digging their own graves (so are Über drivers, of course: the self driving cars that are obviously coming our way by 2020 will make many industries obsolete, including them).
Anyway, to take my mind off this experience I considered how it might relate to advertising.
I’ve written a few times about my theory that improved computing has actually made working in creative industries much harder because now everyone knows how easy it is to change a font or resize a logo. Hell, with a rudimentary knowledge of Word you can slap together a poster with a funky font and a Google image. So now the job looks easy (I’ll have to ignore arguments that say it’s easy to do it in a mediocre way. Unfortunately most clients can’t distinguish mediocre from excellent, or indeed poor, so they don’t care).
Then we made the whole process look easier and easier by sticking logos on the end of YouTube clips and cans of other people’s paint. Back in the day you just had to watch ads like this, pick your jaw up off the floor and throw money at whoever could think up an execute such genius:
When’s the last time an ad made you feel like that?
Of course there are very good ads around these days, but they look somewhat within our grasp in a way that the greats of the past did not. And if they look somewhat within our grasp then they also look a little more like that to clients, and indeed to the public.
It may have been a necessary turn that happened after the first dotcom crash, where budgets and credibility began a gradual process of reduction. It may be the fault of a brain drain that has seen the best creative migrate towards creating TV shows or tech start ups. It may be another consequence of the rapacious march of global capitalism. It may be the way in which ad agencies now charge more for, and place greater emphasis on, the kind of 360-degree brand analysis/futurism conferences that planning departments take care of. It may have something to do with the vicious circle that all these factors create.
But whatever it is we can’t deny that we, as an industry, are like cabbies: we haven’t helped ourselves to justify the value in what we do, or rather what we did. That’s why salaries have fallen. That’s why production companies and TV stations are offering to do what we used to do. That’s why none of your friends or parents give a shit about that case study film you spent so long choosing just the right War On Drugs song to soundtrack. 99.99999% of the time, if it happened online, as far as the public is concerned, it didn’t happen. Sorry.
We don’t accept credit cards. We charge £7 before anyone even moves. We don’t have room for luggage.
And until someone creates a new model to send us off in a different direction, we’re just going to continue getting shafted by our own versions of Uber.
The ball is in all our courts.
Cabs in London are proper expensive and help fund the night bus industry. Fuckers.
No black cabs take card and they treat you like a cunt if you don’t have cash… Cabs are the only thing i use cash for these days unless i’m buying a shitty little round of one in a pub… cabbies are defo killing themselves and not making anyone feel bad about it…. they had their time and charged double time for it, pricks… send them to greece
Blinding post mate. I was standing on my desk at the end shouting ‘No, I am Ben Kay’. Then some digital cunt stole my chair and started a ‘Conversation’.
I don’t like Uber though. Not mad about cabbies but at least they know the way. And I got to see both the Harrods stores last time I used one.
It doesn’t really matter when all of advertising is divided up by the holding companies, does it? In the end, the money goes into one of their fat bank accounts either way.
Great post. I agree with all of the second half. And many black cabs infuriatingly fuel their own downfall, but arguments against Uber fail if they’re limited to ‘taking our jobs’, which is always a flawed argument.
They’re also a company with seriously questionable ethics. They willingly break laws, get drivers to buy their own cars (as they’re not officially employers) and then encourage drivers to use personal insurance for claims (which is illegal). Uber drivers frequently have absolutely no idea where they’re going. Uber uses dodgy surge pricing systems (and it’s been argued their current cheap fares will disappear once their monopoly is complete) and abuse consumer data for entertainment. Some drivers have also abused passengers. I will always agree with progress, but so far, progress with Uber comes at a cost that goes far beyond ‘they’re taking our jobs’.
You couldn’t be more right Ben.
I don’t think this post is about cabs.
More Über and less Black Cab. I’ll have to use that in the next client meeting
@ Lionel
11.01?
Well done for getting on the lash so early.
There’s bits right with uber, there’s bits right with black cabs. Halo was better, yes I paid a bit more but I knew I’d get somewhere quickly, safely and I didn’t need cash.
The industry needs that, some of the old and some of the new and still get f**king paid! Half the industry are throwing out all the old, the other half are clinging to it. I freelance in a lot of places and I see it all the time. At the moment we can’t sort our own business out, why should clients believe we can sort their’s out?
The ball might be in our court but everyone seems so disillusioned that they can’t be bother playing any more, which is a shame.
Thanks for the comments.
Indeed, Über is not perfect. It solves those three problems (and a few others such as ubiquity – apparently drink driving has gone down around 20% in Austin since it was introduced) but sure – there are some other questionable aspects of its business model.
But it seems there are some obvious ways Black Cabs could improve things – lower fares and accepting credit cards being a good start.
Uber is great. I reckon all the stuff Verity talks about, with the greatest of respect, is made up by Cabbies and their union.
All the Uber drivers I know love it. They say they’re being well looked after – can use Uber’s legal strength. And they can guarantee the customer isn’t a dick too.
Like religious types who memorise holy books or designers who learn letterpress, cabbies should cherish the process of acquiring The Knowledge for its own sake. If they spent the same time and effort learning to breakdance, it does not follow that the world can afford to hire that many more ace breakdancers.
Still waiting for Uber Taxi’s comment. Gonna be a good one as usual.
@Anonymouse,
Most drivers I talk to (here in NYC) stop driving for Uber a month or two in. The money is not worth it, they say, especially now with the new pricing structure (25% goes to Uber, plus that one buck on top of the fare).
It’s a vulture business that uber is providing. They could take a much smaller cut out of each fare, and still turn a hefty profit. But all hail the profits! Profit over everything, profit over god, the people, nature, etc…
(excuse this for taking it back to cabs, I know the post isn’t about cabs, but about not being so complacent you fuel your own downfall, however…)
@anonymouse I read it all last year when the $1m journalist dinner chat kicked off. The stories have drowned under the taxi protests but they existed. This covers a few of the issues:
http://www.cnet.com/uk/news/ubers-year-of-prosperity-and-controversy/
This is the infamous ‘Rides of Glory’ story: http://boingboing.net/2014/11/19/uber-can-track-your-one-night.html
and this is ‘God View’, and the time they projected someone’s location on a screen at a private party (he wasn’t at) http://time.com/3595025/uber-data/
The drivers not knowing where they’re going bit is my experience.
If cabs and their unions were powerful enough to get all that in the media I’m not sure they’d be losing the cab fight so badly.
Fuck Halo
@Elias profit over everything, with money that comes from (and will return to) the same old money men http://money.cnn.com/2014/06/06/technology/innovation/uber-funding/ http://venturebeat.com/2015/01/21/goldman-sachs-confirms-1-6b-investment-in-uber/
I’m not defending cabs poor service / overcharging, or the ‘taking our jobs’ shitty attitude, and I think Ad Lee was the first incredible cab service that used tech to give people what they wanted (safe, cheaper, reliable cabs), but at least with black cabs the profits go to individual self-employed cabbies, not back into the international pool of investment banks and hedge funds
I think people will love Uber while it’s cheap and convenient, and at the moment, we still have the alternatives.
But I think it’s not far off being a Tesco story of monopoly and abuse of monopoly power. Given Uber has no respect for the rights of any of its competitors, whether they’re traditional cabs or new techie competitors, we can be sure they’re not in the game to give consumers more choice.
I think this shows that the Uber cunty model in most things is winning by a mile… look how Amazon have completely fucked everyone with margins that would make Lady Godiva blush
Who would be a football manager these days!!!
I love Uber but they could urgently use a good slap.
As usual I blame the holding companies. they rinsed the characters out of advertising. Ideas are only as interesting as the people that create them. that’s the real deficit IMO.